Bonjour
There is no doubt that salary packages play a significant role while choosing a profession. People have a different opinion on whether it is good to avail huge earnings for sporting personalities when compared with other workers. I strongly think that it is acceptable because they have a very short time period to make money, but they return it to society in the form of support and inspiration.
First of all, the career of a sportsman is short-lived when compared with any other profession. This is because they should be physically and mentally fit to participate and make their team win. Due to this, they spend a large volume of time doing practices and physical training to keep their stamina alive, but if at any point, they could not perform as expected, probably, there itself their career may end up. For example, Sachin, a famous cricket star, when he struggled to maintain his physical strength due to ageing, he was avoided by selectors, even, he had many unbreakable records in his name.
Apart from the above-mentioned point, this enormous salary can motivate the youngsters to work hard to build a sporting career. Similarly, it has been noticed that many stars contribute their savings for the development of society, not only in the form of taxes but they do some charity works as well. Alternatively, other employees hardly involve any kind of social development activities. For instance, last year, during a flood, several famous athletes helped poor families to build houses and start a new business to have a fresh start.
In conclusion, although it is sometimes thought that everybody should have an equal salary, it is unethical to have only sports stars making a large amount. My opinion is that since they are active only a few years than other jobs, they deserve it.
je voulais savoir si c'est agree ou disagree?
There is no doubt that salary packages play a significant role while choosing a profession. People have a different opinion on whether it is good to avail huge earnings for sporting personalities when compared with other workers. I strongly think that it is acceptable because they have a very short time period to make money, but they return it to society in the form of support and inspiration.
First of all, the career of a sportsman is short-lived when compared with any other profession. This is because they should be physically and mentally fit to participate and make their team win. Due to this, they spend a large volume of time doing practices and physical training to keep their stamina alive, but if at any point, they could not perform as expected, probably, there itself their career may end up. For example, Sachin, a famous cricket star, when he struggled to maintain his physical strength due to ageing, he was avoided by selectors, even, he had many unbreakable records in his name.
Apart from the above-mentioned point, this enormous salary can motivate the youngsters to work hard to build a sporting career. Similarly, it has been noticed that many stars contribute their savings for the development of society, not only in the form of taxes but they do some charity works as well. Alternatively, other employees hardly involve any kind of social development activities. For instance, last year, during a flood, several famous athletes helped poor families to build houses and start a new business to have a fresh start.
In conclusion, although it is sometimes thought that everybody should have an equal salary, it is unethical to have only sports stars making a large amount. My opinion is that since they are active only a few years than other jobs, they deserve it.
je voulais savoir si c'est agree ou disagree?
Lista de comentários
Tout d'abord, la carrière d'un sportif est de courte durée par rapport à toute autre profession. C'est parce qu'ils doivent être physiquement et mentalement aptes à participer et à faire gagner leur équipe. Pour cette raison, ils passent beaucoup de temps à s'entraîner et à s'entraîner physiquement pour maintenir leur endurance, mais si à un moment donné, ils ne pouvaient pas fonctionner comme prévu, leur carrière pourrait probablement se terminer là-bas. Par exemple, Sachin, une célèbre star du cricket, lorsqu'il a lutté pour maintenir sa force physique en raison du vieillissement, il a été évité par les sélectionneurs, même, il avait de nombreux records incassables à son nom.
Mis à part le point mentionné ci-dessus, ce salaire énorme peut motiver les jeunes à travailler dur pour construire une carrière sportive. De même, il a été remarqué que de nombreuses stars contribuent leurs économies au développement de la société, non seulement sous forme d'impôts, mais également en réalisant des œuvres caritatives. Par ailleurs, les autres employés n'impliquent pratiquement aucune activité de développement social. Par exemple, l'année dernière, lors d'une inondation, plusieurs athlètes célèbres ont aidé des familles pauvres à construire des maisons et à démarrer une nouvelle entreprise pour prendre un nouveau départ.
En conclusion, même si l'on pense parfois que tout le monde devrait avoir un salaire égal, il est contraire à l'éthique de n'avoir que des stars du sport qui gagnent beaucoup. Mon opinion est que puisqu'ils ne sont actifs que quelques années que les autres emplois, ils le méritent.