Both of these sources were produced in the mid-19th century during a period of westward expansion and territorial acquisition by the United States. President James K. Polk delivered his inaugural address in 1845, shortly after taking office, outlining his administration's objectives, including the assertion of U.S. claims to Oregon. John O'Sullivan's article was published in July-August 1845 in the "Democratic Review," reflecting the sentiments and beliefs of many Americans at the time regarding the expansion of the United States.
President Polk believed it was the duty of the United States to claim Oregon because he viewed the country's expansion as a natural and manifest destiny. He argued that as the American population had grown and expanded westward, they had a right to extend the benefits of self-government to the new territories they settled. He believed that the United States had a clear and unquestionable title to Oregon and that it was necessary to protect American emigrants and extend U.S. jurisdiction and institutions to the regions they occupied.
John O'Sullivan's concept of "manifest destiny" was the belief that it was the destiny and duty of the United States to expand across the North American continent from the Atlantic Ocean to the Pacific Ocean. He saw this expansion as ordained by Providence and felt that it was inevitable. O'Sullivan believed that other nations, particularly England and France, were attempting to interfere with American expansion in Texas and California. He argued that the Anglo-Saxon emigration, armed with agricultural and educational tools, was already settling these regions and that it was only a matter of time before they would be fully occupied by American settlers.
In comparing the justifications for expansion, both President Polk and John O'Sullivan believed in the inevitability of westward expansion, viewing it as a duty or destiny for the United States. Polk focused on Oregon as a territory where American emigrants were settling, while O'Sullivan emphasized the broader concept of manifest destiny, encompassing Texas and California. They both saw expansion as a means of fulfilling America's potential and securing its future as a continental nation.
Si vous trouvez ma réponse utile, je vous invite aimablement à la désigner comme la "meilleure réponse" :D.
Lista de comentários
Réponse :
Salut !!
Explications :
Both of these sources were produced in the mid-19th century during a period of westward expansion and territorial acquisition by the United States. President James K. Polk delivered his inaugural address in 1845, shortly after taking office, outlining his administration's objectives, including the assertion of U.S. claims to Oregon. John O'Sullivan's article was published in July-August 1845 in the "Democratic Review," reflecting the sentiments and beliefs of many Americans at the time regarding the expansion of the United States.
President Polk believed it was the duty of the United States to claim Oregon because he viewed the country's expansion as a natural and manifest destiny. He argued that as the American population had grown and expanded westward, they had a right to extend the benefits of self-government to the new territories they settled. He believed that the United States had a clear and unquestionable title to Oregon and that it was necessary to protect American emigrants and extend U.S. jurisdiction and institutions to the regions they occupied.
John O'Sullivan's concept of "manifest destiny" was the belief that it was the destiny and duty of the United States to expand across the North American continent from the Atlantic Ocean to the Pacific Ocean. He saw this expansion as ordained by Providence and felt that it was inevitable. O'Sullivan believed that other nations, particularly England and France, were attempting to interfere with American expansion in Texas and California. He argued that the Anglo-Saxon emigration, armed with agricultural and educational tools, was already settling these regions and that it was only a matter of time before they would be fully occupied by American settlers.
In comparing the justifications for expansion, both President Polk and John O'Sullivan believed in the inevitability of westward expansion, viewing it as a duty or destiny for the United States. Polk focused on Oregon as a territory where American emigrants were settling, while O'Sullivan emphasized the broader concept of manifest destiny, encompassing Texas and California. They both saw expansion as a means of fulfilling America's potential and securing its future as a continental nation.
Si vous trouvez ma réponse utile, je vous invite aimablement à la désigner comme la "meilleure réponse" :D.