Vous pouviez regarder si il y a des fautes en anglais ? sur ce texte: ,! New yorks Times Once upon a time was created a old movie based on a famous book: Annimal Farm, written in 1952. Thanks to the uses of technicolor, they could retranscribe the book into a new and modern Film. But is it nowadays worthwile to be seen? Otherwise, is this just another bad adaptation? That's why why I wrote this article and I'm here to explain you this 2.0 Farm! Characters in the movies are easy-looking? . You can recognize really easily who is the devil charachter or which one would be foolish. This is really helpfull, to make this film easier to be understand from children.We have indeed Napoleon, A black birth mark on his screen would mean he is savage against his mates. You can guess, that he will be mischievous protagonist. On the other hand, we have Old Major, an old exhausted pig who wish to revolt against the farm owners, and Mr Jones, one of the only human portrayed inside it as an alcoholic, naughty farmer. The annimals characteristics changed the skin of themself to make them recognizable. Therefore, they changed the plot of the book Inside the plot, the Filmmaker has removed, added or changed somes informations and facts from the book. The movie forgot completely all the things about the ideology : The sugar candy mountain, a new paradise where annimals could go once they were dead and annimalism is even never formulated. Annimals except pigs have nothing upper to grab to explain their motivations and actions.That's why some annimals are simplified: Boxer is only a worker who thinks to work only more without reason ,Squealer looks less viciouser than inside the book. Some characters are even removed such as Mollie who is missing and the cat, who we see only one time in the movie at the beginning. The Story and background is now focus on few points. Beside, it is more centred on other characters like Mr Whymper. We learnt indeed he had became rich and well-known thanks to trading with The Annimal Farm. MERCI :)