Sur l'étiquette d'un produit liquide déboucheur d'évier, on peut lire:"solution d'hydroxyde de sodium a 10%. On souhaite vérifier cette indication. Pour cela on prépare cinq solutions étalons à partir d'une solution mère S0 d'hydroxyde de sodium Na Oh, et on mesure la conductivité pour chaque solution étalon.
La concentration en soluté apporté de la solution S0 est C0 = 1,0x10^-1mol/L^-1 . Les solutions étalons ont toutes le même volume V= 50.0 mL.

SOLUTION Si S1 S2 S3 S4 S5
Volume Vi 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0
Ci (mmol/L) 1.0 3.0 5.0 7.0 9.0
sigma i (mS/m) 24.8 75.0 124.0 174,5 224,1

2. Proposer un protocole pour préparer les solutions étalons Si dont les concentrations Ci sont indiqués dans le tableau.
3. La masse volumique de la solution S est : p= 1,2x10^3 kg.m^-3
En déduire le pourcentage en masse d'hydroxyde de sodium dans les solutions S et le comparer avec celui indiqué sur l'étiquette.


Pouvez-vous m'aider? Merci d'avance.
Please enter comments
Please enter your name.
Please enter the correct email address.
You must agree before submitting.

Lista de comentários


More Questions From This User See All
Est-ce quelqu'un peut me corriger svp, c'est sur le thème "places and forms of power?" Merci d'avance! :) I am going to talk about the notion of Places and Forms of Power. First of all, I would like to define what it means this notion. The power is the ability to control others, events, or resources; the ability to make things happen despite obstacles, resistance, or opposition. This of course leads to conflict between those who have power and those who don’t. This is the case in USA with Gun-bearing and the death penalty. These two subjects are being debated in the United States. We may wonder who are those who oppose gun bearing and the death penalty? The National Rifle Association are a very powerful lobby in the US. She defends the freedom of bearing arms who is an essential right for the NRA. And for the NRA, the right to exert strength with a gun should be accessible to everyone. But everyone doesn't agree. Some are fighting for the carrying of weapons is controlled like Brady Campaign lobby. They use various means. For example posters. Brady Campaign, on one of its posters named God Bless America highlight the gun murders statistics in USA and as a consequence wants to show that the carrying of weapons must be controlled for to struggle against violence because there are a lot of death in the US owing to the weapons. To struggle against violence, many states in the USA still has the death penalty. For them it is the best way to reduce violence. Criminals have easy access to weapons, the death penalty can deter them. But the death penalty and its methods are inhumane. This is what a lawyer tries to explain to the audience to defend Matthew Poncelet who is sentenced to death. His objective is to sensitize the audience against the horror of lethal injection. Several organizations struggle against the death penalty such as Amnesty International for instance. In addition, some famous people give their opinions like the actor Jeremy Irons who give several arguments against the death penalty, such as The death penalty does not reduce crime, so, it is not deterrent, it is irreversible and results in the death of innocents and children. In conclusion, it is mostly the organizations who oppose the carrying of weapons and the death penalty for different reasons and in different ways. But everyone can oppose carrying weapons and the death penalty according to his personal opinion. Personally, I find that carry a gun, even controlled dangerous because anybody can suddenly kill someone. And concerning the death penalty is not a good way to deter criminals.
Responda

Recomendar perguntas

Helpful Social

Copyright © 2025 ELIBRARY.TIPS - All rights reserved.